that is all i do to show that the regulation is not cut down and there may be no impunity,“ said oc kaligis, via an open letter acquired, tuesday (12/14/2021). „the entirety i’ve opened and what i say is all of the statistics of the name of the police case, i am not afraid even though i’m now a resident of lapas suka miskin.
hopefully this open letter brings benefits to greater equitable law enforcement. the kpk court is a charade court. the data at trial are continually ruled out. i made this open letter whilst fellow criminal practitioners have been silent, despite the fact that i used to be privy to a rotten kpk, inclusive of the findings of the residence of representatives in 2018. which includes the findings of affiliates as practitioners while defending customers who are thrown via the kpk.
they had been in brief detained in makko brimob, after the prosecutor’s workplace determined their corruption case become declared a entire file alias p-21. the destruction of regulation enforcement started out from the kpk thru regulation no. is the chief commissioner of antasari, a reputable prosecutor, who is trying to easy up kpk corruption. antasari became successful, beginning from the netted corruption suspects benih and chandra hamzah, both of whom had served as kpk commissioners. the outcomes of antasari’s research, inflicting benih-chandra hamzah, have been suspected and specified as corruption defendants.
his call turned into by no means restored. however my objections had been unnoticed with the aid of abdullah hehamahua because the leader of the ethics exam. i item due to the fact benih continues to be a suspected deponeering corruption. assisting media, in no manner open the rotten role of chandra hamzah despite the fact that found out numerous times nazaruddin’s meeting with chandra hamzah. how can a suspect be prosecuted and appear at an ethics listening to? exam of the code of ethics within the nazarudin generation, i attended with my advise brother boy and dea tunggaesti. seedlings are gift as individuals of the ethics examiner.
some of names had been also dragged into the case of undertaking control. antasari managed to clean up the kpk, even because of his courage to arrest the president of sby pohan’s brother, antasari turned into in the end thrown into prison through case engineering. masaro, returned the kpk within the case of nazaruddin. nazaruddin became even capable of meet chandra hamzah in person in his examine. now not to mention the deterrent of being mark inside the case of pt.
of direction, those present have been disenchanted, together with ethics member dr. not like the ethical exam of lili pintauli siregar’s brother. why is the records of the event revisited? none apart from to examine the decision of kpk deputy commissioner lili pintauli siregar with participants of commissioner chandra hamzah, benih and buddies. the very last end result of abdullah hehamahua’s selection became to loose chandra hamzah from moral violations.
otto cornelis kaligis, matafakta now domiciled in regulation even as in lapas suka miskin, together invitations all fellow legal advisors who have a judgment of right and wrong of justice to reflect at the fall apart of regulation enforcement on indonesian earth. the letter is open to all criminal observers, i prof.
besides, while involved kpk people inside the generation of agus rahardjo, saut situmorang, novel baswedan, abdullah hehamahua, kpk imaging plotters, media, icw, supporting ngos along with mata najwa who eternal grudge in opposition to the constructed citizens, they silence 1000 languages. because the dpr ri supervised the kpk novel, at that time the kpk put up a fight thru a lawsuit to the constitutional court. even the kpk ott before firli became suggested as the only service of novel baswedan’s moves, even supposing practitioners knew that the actions of kpk investigators and investigators have been collective moves.
arie muladi, to blackmail anggodo? or how is the position of some kpk individuals to take care of the task in the case of nazaruddin, treasurer of the democratic birthday celebration? together with the function of abraham samad who went from side to side to touch nasdem and pdip officials, lobby to break out him to turn out to be vice chairman? isn’t in step with saut situmorang, according with kpk ethics guidelines, kasak kusuk abraham samad or chandra hamzah’s pleasant actions related to nazaruddin, no longer handiest encompass moral violations but additionally pretty fall into the class of criminal acts? why did saut situmorang, novel baswedan et al no longer crowded to convey ade rahardjo, chandra hamzah to courtroom? even if lili piintauli is simplest called via the suspect mayor of tanjung balai, then what approximately the ethical exam of chandra hamzah, or the deeds of „markus“ brother ade rahardja who time and again contacted ir.
jakarta information – prof. the advise who’s presently a resident of lapas suka miskin bandung, said he changed into now not afraid and could in no way backpedal to preserve to disclose the case, both within the maupin court docket thru an open letter. oc kaligis for the umpteenth time spread out approximately the case of the alleged homicide that allegedly ensnared novel baswedan while serving inside the bengkulu police.