i dare say right here, the purpose of the fall apart is definitely due to the movements of a suspected molester and murderer named novel baswedan. figures who manage the media, manage icw, ngos, ombudsman, komnas ham and all professors who’re blind to the regulation so easily provoked, to conspire with novel baswedan just to lie to regulation enforcement.
and so on, no extra picked slashes. i’m not an professional at organizing street justices or collecting professors for imaging, as novel et al did. komnas ham does now not care approximately the killing of civilians in papua who are scavenging windfalls, building roads? or the human rights violations in poso that slaughter civilians through anarchist agencies?
besides, whilst involved kpk humans in the technology of agus rahardjo, saut situmorang, novel baswedan, abdullah hehamahua, kpk imaging plotters, media, icw, helping ngos such as mata najwa who everlasting grudge against the constructed citizens, they silence one thousand languages. for the reason that dpr ri supervised the kpk novel, at that time the kpk positioned up a combat via a lawsuit to the constitutional court docket. even the kpk ott before firli was suggested as the only carrier of novel baswedan’s actions, even though practitioners knew that the movements of kpk investigators and investigators were collective actions.
consisting of the function of abraham samad who went backward and forward to touch nasdem and pdip officers, foyer to escape him to end up vp? or how is the position of a few kpk participants to attend to the task in the case of nazaruddin, treasurer of the democratic birthday celebration? arie muladi, to blackmail anggodo? why did saut situmorang, novel baswedan et al now not crowded to carry ade rahardjo, chandra hamzah to courtroom? despite the fact that lili piintauli is most effective called by the suspect mayor of tanjung balai, then what approximately the moral examination of chandra hamzah, or the deeds of „markus“ brother ade rahardja who again and again contacted ir. isn’t in step with saut situmorang, according with kpk ethics regulations, kasak kusuk abraham samad or chandra hamzah’s friendly movements related to nazaruddin, not only consist of ethical violations but also fairly fall into the category of crook acts?
„the whole lot i have opened and what i say is all the information of the title of the police case, i am now not afraid even though i’m now a resident of lapas suka miskin. that is all i do to show that the regulation isn’t always reduce down and there is no impunity,“ stated oc kaligis, via an open letter acquired, tuesday (12/14/2021).
to the kpk led via firli bahuri, the board of trustees, and for lili pintauli siregar, i dare say that you as regulation enforcement do no longer hesitate to help combat for novel baswedan the heinous killer to be attempted without delay. forget about the hoax news saut situmorang, a collection of novel baswedan who need to deliver moral verdicts into the crook realm. preserve running, make a truthful kpk. cook best baswedan novels can report you?
otto cornelis kaligis, berita terbaru [www.adjib.dj] now domiciled in law while in lapas suka miskin, collectively invites all fellow legal advisors who have a conscience of justice to mirror on the fall apart of law enforcement on indonesian earth. the letter is open to all prison observers, i prof.
exam of the code of ethics in the nazarudin generation, i attended with my suggest brother boy and dea tunggaesti. i item because benih remains a suspected deponeering corruption. supporting media, in no way open the rotten role of chandra hamzah despite the fact that revealed numerous instances nazaruddin’s meeting with chandra hamzah. his call was never restored. however my objections have been not noted via abdullah hehamahua because the chief of the ethics examination. seedlings are present as contributors of the ethics examiner. how can a suspect be prosecuted and seem at an ethics listening to?
consisting of the findings of work-mates as practitioners while defending customers who are thrown via the kpk. the data at trial are constantly ruled out. the kpk court is a charade court. i made this open letter while fellow legal practitioners had been silent, even though i used to be privy to a rotten kpk, together with the findings of the residence of representatives in 2018. hopefully this open letter brings benefits to more equitable law enforcement.
the query is, did lili pintauli’s brother influence the case of the mayor of tanjung balai? inspite of the moral punishment in opposition to lili, the click supporters of novel baswedan continuously led the news to dissolve the kpk led via firli bahuri. to freeze the criminal case of novel baswedan handiest, until a meeting become held among the pinnacle of kpk commissioner agus rahardjo and legal professional standard prasetyo, specifically to talk about the homicide case novel baswedan in order now not to continue. the affect of novel baswedan to undermine the rule of thumb of regulation of the republic of indonesia is indeed remarkable. not in place of coming into a terrorist executioner’s protection agency? are not they presupposed to be examples of law enforcement? why did no media dare to file the news of the bengkulu district court’s ruling, which ordered that novel baswedan be attempted right now?